Efforts to share the benefits of hydropower development in Nepal could be compounding inequality in the country instead of tackling it, according to research from the International Water Management Institute (IWMI).
One of the most water-abundant countries in the world, with vast areas of hills and mountains, Nepal has been the focus of hydropower development for decades.
But the local costs of hydropower projects can be significant. They can mean the displacement of farming communities to clear the way for dams or reservoirs, and disruptions to local hydrology and ecosystems. Meanwhile, the benefits – the production of electricity, primarily – accrue elsewhere, in relatively wealthy urban and peri-urban areas that enjoy access to the national grid.
In an attempt to address the mismatch, in the early 2000s, Nepal introduced a law to plough a portion of the revenues from taxes levied on hydropower companies back to the areas where their installations are located. Each year, this money is paid as a royalty to district offices and the larger ‘development regions’ in which they reside.
Speaking at the Hydropower & Dams Asia 2014 Conference in Colombo, Sri Lanka, last week, Soumya Balasubramanya from IWMI argued that these efforts – while implemented with the best of intentions – have not had the desired effect. Rather than reducing inequality in the distribution of the benefits of hydropower, in some cases, she says, they may have actually reinforced it.
“It’s not a problem with the concept of revenue sharing per se,” said Balasubramanya. “It’s rather that most hydropower development in Nepal is concentrated in a few areas that already have the infrastructure to support it.”
[pullquote type=”pullquote1″ content=”That means the system is channeling more money into wealthier areas, relative to poorer ones that have little or no hydropower development.” quote_icon=”yes” align=”center”]That means the system is channeling more money into wealthier areas, relative to poorer ones that have little or no hydropower development.[/pullquote]She points to Nepal’s West and Central development regions, which have seen the “lion’s share” of the country’s hydropower projects, and the majority of the redistributed revenues.
“At one scale, the royalty system works, because money is flowing to the districts rather than being held in the coffers of the central government. But, overall, the system is unlikely to close the gap between districts that do have hydropower development and those that don’t.
But for Balasubramanya, this doesn’t mean the system is without its merits. “Having a law that stipulates how revenues from hydropower development should be shared means Nepal is still way ahead of many other countries,” she continued.
“We have to be clear though, that the main effect of the law has probably been to reduce public opposition to hydropower development. That’s because there is a perception that some of the money earned from the use of rivers – often regarded as a common resource – is being channeled back into the region. If you really want to improve equity, you need to think about the much broader process of development, including but not limited to hydropower,” she said.
You can see the presentation here. The full results of Soumya Balasubramanya’s research are expected to be published later in the year.
[hr top=”yes”/]Soumya Balasubramanya is a Researcher – Environmental Economics at the International Water Management Institute (IWMI) in Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Population pressure and increasing water competition in a changing climate require us to take stock of the availability and use of water across scales. Water availability not only influences farmers’ commercial prospects but also irrigation-related enterprises and agri-businesses. Greater water scarcity could jeopardize irrigation and agricultural markets while excessive water use can lead to declining ecosystems, water quality and soil health. IWMI advises development partners and the public and private sectors on all aspects of water resource availability and use through a variety of advanced modeling and remote-sensing products and tools, including 
The ability of farmers to engage in or expand irrigation depends on the prevailing socioeconomic, ecological and political contexts, which are often complex, non-linear and changeable. Overcoming systemic barriers to farmer-led irrigation development while taking advantage of existing opportunities 
A lack of affordable credit, particularly for women and resource-poor farmers, is one of the main barriers to expanding farmer-led irrigation in low- and middle-income countries. But 
Scaling farmer-led irrigation requires strengthening human capacity and knowledge exchange among all actors and stakeholders involved. IWMI takes an action research approach, working with national and international research institutions, governments, extension agents and public and private organizations to co-develop the scaling ecosystem and strengthen capacity to drive scaling networks and collective action. We support the