WWW.IWMI.ORG
IWMI Southern Africa Office

IWMI West Africa

Project Portfolio

Partnerships

Publication List

News and Events

Contact

Career

 

Please report
broken links

 
Cities Farming for the Future (CFF)

On-going Activities

Multi-stakeholder Forum on Urban Agriculture in Accra

IWMI, in collaboration with the Metropolitan Directorate of the Ministry of Food and Agriculture (MoFA) organized a two-day multi-stakeholder forum at the Institute of Local Government Studies, Accra on 29th-30th November 2005. The theme for the forum was “Urban and peri-urban agriculture for food security, livelihood support and urban greening”. Fifty-four (54) participants, including top- and middle-level management staff of government departments and agencies, NGOs, farmer organizations, university and research institutions and the media from Accra were at the forum. The forum was chaired by a member of the RUAF Regional Advisory Committee and a keynote address given by the National Director of the Directorate of Agricultural Extension of the Ministry of Food and Agriculture. The forum discussed the report of the exploratory study and the policy narrative on the issues for intervention. Summary of the emerging issues for intervention are as below:

Policy & Legislative support for UPA There is currently no specific policy support for UPA. This makes the practice unplanned and unorganised.
Education & public awareness on urban agriculture;
urban food safety towards positive perception of UPA
Some agricultural practices in and around have generated negative perceptions about UPA. Highlighting the importance of food safety on production, handling, storage and processing will contribute to reducing health risks associated with UPA.
Capacity building for farmer associations Capacity building is required on various issues such as access to credit, access to appropriate farm inputs, record keeping and proper use of agro-chemicals
 
Land tenure & urban agriculture With lands within the urban areas diminishing, policy makers can facilitate access to land for farming e.g. through land allocation for farming on urban fringes, supporting agriculture on institutional land and demarcation/zoning of vacant spaces for specific forms of agriculture.
 
Promotion of UPA enterprises Promotion of non-traditional farming (such as, mushroom, grasscutter, snail, poultry, aquaculture, medicinal plants, bee keeping in the peri-urban), ornamental crops and space confined technologies28.02.07tion systems: e.g. for dairy farming, processing of dairy products, etc.
 
Development of collaborative UPA projects/programmes among key stakeholders Urban agriculture is multidisciplinary in nature and involves several stakeholders. Therefore approaching project implementation from the multi-stakeholder angle gives opportunity to all key stakeholders to bring their unique expertise to bear on the project.
Standards and quality assurance: Strategies to minimise health & environmental risks associated with UPA Addressing the health and environmental risks associated with UPA will help boost the confidence of the public in patronising UPA products. Currently, one key issue in this category is the use of marginal quality water for cultivation of vegetables.
Improvement in post- harvest handling (processing&marketing) of farm produce Post-harvest handling should be addressed holistically from farm to the table so as to be able to offer concrete solutions to various sources of contamination.
Gender mainstreaming Any intervention in UPA will affect men and women differently and will therefore be important to the policy maker to carefully assess the level of impact of interventions with that aim at reducing the weaknesses and increasing the strengths of the various gender groupings.
 
Monitoring & evaluation in UPA Information from monitoring and evaluation can be used for a variety of purposes including: informing policy, monitoring standards, introducing realistic standards, identifying correlates of  performance in UPA enterprises, increasing public awareness and informing political debate.
 
Coordination With many stakeholders involved in agriculture within and around the cities, there’s the need for coordination to avoid duplicated efforts and ensure that limited resources are put to maximum use.
 
Networking & linkages Partnerships and linkages including networking among all stakeholders such as traditional rulers, land owners, educational institutions, governments, NGOs and the District Assemblies, are important to create synergies and develop an integrated approach to UPA. There’s the need for networking with organizations within and outside Ghana for the purposes of information support and funding.
 

The issues and intervention areas were prioritized by participants for action:

 

Issue/Area

 

 

Priority Position

 

Percentage rating

Policy and legislative support for UA

1st

72.7%

Education and public awareness on urban agriculture and urban food safety towards positive perception of UA

2nd

 

66.7%

Standards and quality assurance

3rd

60.6%

Promotion of UA enterprises

4th

60.6%

Capacity building for farmer associations: Facilitate the formalization of farmer associations

5th

 

45.5%

Development of collaborative UA projects/programmes among key stakeholders

6th

42.4%

Post-harvest handling and marketing

7th

33.3%

Land tenure and urban agriculture

8th

9.1%

The following issues were identified as cross-cutting issues and were therefore not included in the prioritization:
- Gender and urban agriculture,
- Monitoring and evaluation,
- Co-ordination, and
- Networking / linkages.

A consensus reached to develop action plans for implementation. Draft action plans were developed and the forum constituted a Working Group to further elaborate the Action plans into pilot project(-s), coordinate the implementation of the pilot projects and develop strategies to institutionalize the multi-stakeholder forum.  The forum also developed a joint forum statement of purpose which was later presented to the policy makers for validation Detail information is in the forum report.

Lessons learned/Challenges

From the evaluation done at the end of the forum, participants would have welcomed more days of less number of hours per day to better internalize the issues, visualize its practicalities and implications. The challenge is whether the same participants would be available during the subsequent workshops to ensure continuity.

 

IWMI's mission is to improve water and land resources management for food, livelihoods and nature
    Last update: 27.02.07