The research questions
|
-
How do rice yields, profitability and on farm water balance components of Water
Saving Irrigation (WSI) methods (such as alternate wetting and drying (AWD),
partially rain-fed (PRF), flush irrigation (FI)) perform? What is the
performance in field conditions of aerobic rice compared with continuously
flooded rice.
-
What are the impacts of alternative water-saving management practices at farm,
irrigation system and sub-basin levels? What are the best options for improving
river water flows and minimizing adverse economic and environmental impacts of
these irrigation areas?
-
How effective are the policies, institutions, management practices and
infrastructure that are currently in place for water allocation and
utilization? What are the incentives to adopt water-saving practices at farm
and system levels?
-
What areas are best suited for the promotion of selected water-saving
technologies determined by this research and what is the best way to promote
these technologies and policies in those regions?
|
|
Objective
|
|
To promote water management techniques in rice-based irrigation systems that
sustain the environment and allow the crop production to be maintained or
increased in the face of growing demands for competing uses of water.
|
|
Methods
|
-
The research was carried out at three locations with contrasting
soil-hydrological and institutional environments
-
The Zhanghe Irrigation System (ZIS) in the Yangtze River basin
-
The Liuyuankuo Irrigation System (LIS) in the physically water-scarce Yellow
River Basin
-
The Murrumbidgee Irrigation Area (MIA) in NSW, Australia; a major sub-catchment
of the Murray Darling Basin.
-
Controlled field experiments, farm surveys and socioeconomic surveys were
carried out at the field level at the selected sites for both aerobic and
flooded rice systems.
-
Field results were then tested and confirmed by simulations using ORYZA2000
crop model, which was used to assess the effect of AWD and aerobic rice under
different hydrological conditions and water management scenarios.
-
Outputs from ORYZA2000 were used in the regional models to investigate the
effects of AWD on system level hydrology and water productivity.
-
The water balance was studied at farm, meso scale and sub-basin level using
field data collection and analysis. MODFLOW and VENSIM models were used in a
hydrologic-economic analysis, at Liuyuankuo, of different scenarios for water
savings. These scenarios consisted of different combinations of
-
Canal lining
-
Ground water development (GW) in the northern part (above the railway line,
ARL) of LIS
-
Distributing surface water to below the railway line. MODFLOW, VENSIM and SWAP
models were used to quantify water saving at farm and system-level in the
Murrumbidgee catchment. Simulations using an IWMI developed model, OASIS, were
used to investigate the relative role of AWD, small storage, and water
allocation practices, and to help managers understand the implications of
various water savings options at Zhanghe.
-
Information on policies and institutions was gathered based on interviews at
different levels - from policy makers, irrigation system managers, village
leaders and farmers. the surveys picked up relevant information.
|
|
Project leader
Hugh Turral (H.Turral@cgiar.org)
|
|
Researchers
Barker, Randolph; Hoanh, Chu Thai; Loeve, Ronald; Molden, David; Zhu, Zhongping
|
|
Major Donors
Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Unrestricted Funding
|
|
Project Duration
01 July 2001 to 31 December 2006
|